Lysenkoism, Lenin's Brain, Pavlov's Dogs and The Real Anthony Fauci
by Not Sure
22 May 2022
Not because he was a dog lover, but because he was missing basic human qualities, Ivan Pavlov noticed the reflex whereby dogs would only produce saliva when they saw food or ate it. To study this, he developed a “sham” feeding system. He would remove a dog’s esophagus and create an opening, a fistula, in the animal’s throat, so that, no matter how much the dog ate, the food would fall out and never make it to the stomach. By creating additional fistulas along the digestive system and collecting the various secretions, he could measure the quantity and chemical properties of the saliva. He would restrain the dogs in harnesses, administer electric shocks.
The paper that Pavlov wrote about his findings created the concept of classical conditioning for which he won the Nobel Prize in 1904.
But the story doesn’t end there. On September 23, 1924, a flood swept St. Petersburg (then called Leningrad.) Pavlov’s lab dogs were trapped in his basement laboratory. The desperate dogs were forced to crane their necks high, sticking their noses at the top of the cages as the water rose higher. After several hours, Pavlov’s assistants were able to get inside the lab to rescue them. They had to forcibly submerge the dogs, yank them through the kennel doors and make them swim in groups a quarter of a mile to the main laboratory.
The dogs were safe but traumatized, and when experiments resumed, they no longer salivated when prompted. Pavlov was forced to starve the dogs for several days to ascertain if they could be returned to their pre-flood conditioning. From a paper that Pavlov wrote in 1927:
“A week after the flood the dog was brought in to the experimental room and placed in its stand. The animal was abnormally restless and all conditioned reflexes were practically absent, and, though usually very ready for food, the animal now would not touch the food and even turned its head away. During three days while the animal was purposely left without food its general behaviour during the experiments remained unaltered. On considering various possible interpretations we reached the conclusion that this extraordinary behaviour of the animal must still be an [p. 314] after-effect of the flood, and the following method of combating the disturbance was adopted: Instead of leaving the animal alone during the experiment the experimenter now remained in the same room with it, while I myself conducted the experiment from the outside. All the reflexes showed an immediate restoration in the first experiment and the animal took the food with avidity, but it was sufficient for the experimenter to leave the animal alone for all the abnormal symptoms to recur. In order to re-establish the reflexes permanently it was necessary to adopt the above course, of alternately leaving and entering the room, for a considerable period of time. On the eleventh day of this treatment a conditioned stimulus which had not been employed since before the flood was now for the first time again employed, namely, the buzzer, which was the strongest stimulus, and which before the hood constantly evoked the largest secretion. After the application of the buzzer all the remaining conditioned reflexes almost completely disappeared, the animal again declined the food, became very restless and continuously stared at the door. Under the influence of the same special stimulus, namely, the presence of the experimenter in the room with the animal, the reflexes were again gradually restored, but repetition of the buzzer after an interval of five days produced the disturbance afresh. The buzzer was then applied only when the experimenter was in the room with the animal, but even so, normal relations only returned gradually and very slowly. On many occasions a phase of equalization of the reflexes was observed after administration of the buzzer, the reflexes often diminishing and the animal declining the food. Perfectly normal reflexes were at last obtained after forty-seven days of experimentation, i.e. two months after the flood.”
The interesting thing about being human is that you don’t have to torture dogs in order to gain understanding. When I read the paragraph above, this is what I glean: Dogs kept in cages for their entire lives, with their esophagus removed, drooling as trained, suffered an even more traumatic event when their little sentient brains sensed that death by drowning was imminent. Upon “rescue” they lost interest in eating unless a human was in the room. If a human (even a cold, white-coated inhuman type of human) was present, then they would eat. It took that demented old “scientist” two months to break them again.
His-story tells us that Pavlov, a veritable hero in the world of Sick-Ology, didn’t like Communism, didn’t like Lenin, wanted to leave Russia and do his studies elsewhere, but Lenin wouldn’t have it. He wanted the prestige of a Nobel Prize winner, and so Pavlov was made to stay, given what he needed for his work ad even his criticisms of Lenin and the Soviet system were tolerated. He was highly regarded by the Soviet government, able to continue his research to an advanced age and praised by Lenin. He died in 1936.
Trofim Lysenko was a Soviet agronomist and biologist. He was a proponent of Lamarckism and rejected Mendelian genetics in favor of his own pseudoscientific ideas later termed Lysenkoism. He believed that wheat seeds could go through a “chilling” process and the seeds of winter cereals could be forced to behave like spring cereals. Soviet scientists who refused to renounce genetics and get in line with his program were dismissed from their posts and left destitute. Hundreds if not thousands of others were imprisoned. Many were sentenced to death as enemies of the state, including the botanist Nikolai Vavilov. Lysenko's ideas and practices contributed to the famines that killed millions of Soviet people; the adoption of his methods from 1958 in the People's Republic of China had similarly calamitous results, culminating in the Great Chinese Famine of 1959 to 1962.
He maintained his post at the Institute of Genetics until 1965. Though his influence on Soviet agricultural practice declined after Stalin’s death in 1953, he still had the support of Nikita Khrushchev. In the early 1960s, some criticism of Lysenko was tolerated for the first time since the late 1920s and in 1962, three of the most prominent Soviet physicists proclaimed his work pseudoscience. Disgraced, Lysenko died in Moscow in 1976.
In this Redux from 14 December 2014 entitled "Reason Battles for Logical Conclusion in This Age of Manufactured Confusion", Alan talks about how all news, even what we think of as alternative, is controlled. He said that we are trained to trust the experts and we simply can’t believe that scientists would lie to us. “Oh yes they would” he said and mentions Trofim Lysenko and Lysenkoism as an example of how a grotesque lie can be made into state policy to be followed on pain of death. “Trust the science.”
Alan was covering a story about the Green Climate Fund, which is supposed to help mobilize as much as $100 billion a year to lower global greenhouse gases, seeking a UN-style blanket immunity that would shield its operations from any kind of legal process, including civil and criminal prosecution, in the countries where it operates. But the Green Climate Fund is not part of the UN. The organization just wanted to be sure that if the public ever found out what lies they are telling, we can’t take them to court.
We are living in such a carefully constructed web of lies and by now we should all know that. We’ve been given the wet market, bat guano explanation of a virus that was a lab manufactured bioweapon. Absolute quackery such as face masks and social distancing have been mandated. Promising treatments were withheld from the ill and other “treatments” were required if one wanted to travel, attend school, keep a job. Deaths and injuries from the emergency use experimental vaccine received no mainstream coverage. As Alex Berenson said, “Don’t think of it as a vaccine. Think of it as best-as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy and terrible side effect profile”. He was slammed for saying that.
Don’t believe the anthropogenic climate change theory. Denier! Conspiracy theorist. Hater!
Don’t want an mRNA “jab”, even for free fries and a hamburger? Anti-vaxxer! Vaccine denier! From a 2020 Science Direct study: “it is… surprising that so many people fear vaccines and even deny their efficacy. So much so that some psychologists have been trying to figure out what makes antivaxxers tick.”
Don’t forget for a second that we’re looking at one agenda. It’s all part of the same depopulation/eugenics goal. Here’s the title of a recent Nature article: How climate law can help to prevent the next pandemic.
Last month, the IPCC released a report warning that rapid and deep cuts to greenhouse gas emissions are necessary by 2025 to avoid catastrophic climate effects. Over 1,000 scientists from 25 different countries staged protests. The group is called Scientist Rebellion. We can trust the urgency of the climate situation because they’re scientists, right?
· Here’s last month’s IPCC story: IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster. When I opened up the link, at the top of page it read “this story is more than a month old.” If it was “now or never” a month ago, why are we still here?
· In 2008, Prince Charles warned we had eighteen months to stop climate change disaster.
· In 2009, Prince Charles said “100 months to act on climate”. He had to revise his 2008 prognostication, but just to save you doing the math, 100 months from 2009 is 8. 333333333333333 years, which means that we needed to save the world by 2017. Those lying scientists, the UN and the mountain of NGOs that do their bidding have no shame. It’s “now or never”.
· In 2009, Al Gore said that Arctic ice may soon disappear in summer. In 2014, the Daily Mail reported that satellite images showed that summer ice was thicker and covered more area despite Gore’s scary scenario. Another inconvenient truth.
· We know that the IPCC 2007 report used magazine articles for references.
· 2009 brought us Climategate, where leaked emails from University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) showed data that was manipulated (to put it gently.) The late Christopher Booker of the Telegraph wrote “What we are looking at here is the small group of scientists who have for years been more influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming than any others, not least through the role they play at the heart of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).”
Booker continued, “Professor Philip Jones, the CRU’s director, is in charge of the two key sets of data used by the IPCC to draw up its reports. Through its link to the Hadley Centre, part of the UK Met Office, which selects most of the IPCC’s key scientific contributors, his global temperature record is the most important of the four sets of temperature data on which the IPCC and governments rely – not least for their predictions that the world will warm to catastrophic levels unless trillions of dollars are spent to avert it.
Dr Jones is also a key part of the closely knit group of American and British scientists responsible for promoting that picture of world temperatures conveyed by Michael Mann’s “hockey stick” graph which 10 years ago turned climate history on its head by showing that, after 1,000 years of decline, global temperatures have recently shot up to their highest level in recorded history.”
· In 2010, Dr. Rajenda Pachauri, then head of the IPCC released what was described as a “smutty” romance novel, Return to Almora laced with lots of steamy sex, and heaving, voluptuous breasts.
· In 2020, the World Health Organization canceled trials of hydroxychloroquine because they got questionable data from a small US healthcare company that employed a sci-fi writer and a porn star. The Dissident Voice wrote a good article about the sad lack of outrage within the scientific community. “The spin given to the news was not much about why or how it happened – how reputed scientists and The Lancet were fooled by fake data – but mostly about how bad it looked for everyone and how the need for remedies for the pandemic was driving scientists and regulatory bodies to bypass important scrutiny.”
· In 2021, India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) scientists were caught manipulating more than eighty images.
· Also in 2021, India’s Shekhar Mande of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) claimed that the peer review system – or the examination of academic work by others in the same field – has broken down because authors can simply pay to be published.
· Last year, Dr Joseph Mercola was forced to delete thousands of articles in a two-day period because of Big Pharma censorship.
Not all scientists and doctors have lied to us about climate change, or about Covid. We’ve all seen many brave scientists take a stand in the face of censorship, financial hardship and ridicule from peers to share their observations and experiences. The institutions that have lied to us were trusted by these doctors and scientists. Some of them like Mike Yeadon and Peter McCollough went through a period of total disbelief that these scientific bodies could outright lie. Here’s a bit of an interview between a pathologist, Dr. Kevin Homer, and Steve Bannon:
Steve Bannon: Why is CDC doing this? Why is CDC doing this? They’ve never done it before, why are they doing it now?
Kevin Homer: You know, that’s a really good question and I’ve got to say, I’ve got a great deal of respect for the CDC throughout my whole career. They’ve been behind the [curve] sometimes but we look to them for answers in the medical community. We really do. We trust their data, we trust what they say. So it does kind of boggle my mind. I don’t have a good answer for that. I’ve got three speculative ideas, but I can’t really answer the question.
The other thing that they say that I don’t understand at all—and this is directly in my world as a pathologist—is they say “don’t test! If you get the vaccine, you don’t need to be testing antibodies afterward to make sure the vaccine worked. Don’t be testing antibodies before you get the vaccine to see if you actually need one.” Well that’s—we’ve never done that. We always test. We don’t want to give people—the [Hippocratic] oath, right, [is] “do no harm”—you don’t want to give people an added risk for something they will have no benefit from. In my book, that’s harm. So that just doesn’t make sense to me.
But it gets even worse than that. Now we see, right at the very top of the CDC, the director of the CDC calling this “a pandemic of the un-vaccinated.” We are getting this division between the vaccinated and the un-vaccinated . . .
Steve Bannon: Is that a lie? When she says that, is that a lie?
Kevin Homer: To me it is.
Steve Bannon: Why?
Kevin Homer: The CDC’s MMWR report that came out a week ago Friday on a community of highly vaccinated individuals in [Barnstable County] Massachusetts shocked some people because three fourths of the cases were in fully vaccinated individuals. And when they measured the viral loads between vaccinated and un-vaccinated, they were identical.
You know, the other thing they say is “if you take the vaccine, you don’t have to go to the hospital [because] you don’t get that sick.” Well in this particular report—small study, emerging data, we’ve got to watch it and not draw sweeping conclusions—but four out of five patients who were sick enough to be hospitalized had been fully vaccinated. So it does not make sense that the fully vaccinated are not spreading the disease.
I mean, you just have to follow Texas politics and see what happened in that plane that took the Democrats to Washington DC to avoid sitting in the legislature. They were all vaccinated; they all got sick.
Steve Bannon: You’re warning today to people would be what? . . .What would be your recommendation to this audience of what they must do today.
Kevin Homer: Look, when we divide people we lose trust in each other, just like I’ve kind of lost a little trust in the CDC because they don’t seem to be telling us the truth. People need to be making individual decisions. . . . For some people it makes great sense to take a vaccine, because their risk of dying from Covid is very high. For other people, it doesn’t.
I’ve got a good friend who called me last night, a colleague, a young researcher. He said, “I’m not a basic science researcher, but I can read the data, and I have calculated that my risk of dying from Covid is astronomically low, and my risk from the vaccine is also low, but a little higher than dying from Covid. I’m not going to take it, and they’re making me take it.”
I’ve written about my own journeys down the rabbit holes of the alternative world. Alan Watt often warned us that we are given our leaders. We don’t have lifetimes to do the investigative work to see who is working counterintelligence and disinfo to keep us running in circles and who is sincerely risking everything to shine some light in the dark.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has for years participated in work exposing vaccine damage, corruption in Big Pharma and Big Tech and more recently in bringing to light the abuses that have been part of our various governments’ policies regarding Covid-19. He has also been a big proponent of sustainability and what is sometimes called the “Green Agenda”. He has written a book called The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health. In the introduction to this book, he writes:
“The very governmental health regulators, social media eminences, and media companies that idealistic populations relied upon as champions of freedom, health, democracy, civil rights, and evidence-based public policy seemed to collectively pivot in a lockstep assault against free speech and personal freedoms. Suddenly, those trusted institutions seemed to be acting in concert to generate fear, promote obedience, discourage critical thinking, and herd seven billion people to march to a single tune, culminating in mass public health experiments with a novel, shoddily tested and improperly licensed technology so risky that manufacturers refused to produce it unless every government on Earth shielded them from liability.”
Foxy Fauci said, “I think if you look at my career there are not a lot of people that would be attacking my career, but he seems to do that,” Fauci continued in the comments published earlier this week. “It’s very unfortunate because I don’t think he is inherently malicious. I just think he’s a very disturbed individual. And I … I don’t like to have to say that, but it’s very, very clear. And it’s a shame because he comes from such an extraordinarily distinguished family, many members of whom I know personally, and I was very close to Senator Ted Kennedy, who was such an extraordinary person and a real warrior for public health. And to have RFK Jr. just spouting things that make absolutely no sense.”
RFK Jr. is a dark horse, but Tony Fauci is a piece of…dark matter.
Three weeks after the Biden administration formed the Disinformation Governance Board, they “paused” it. But don’t think the Ministry of Truth is dead. It’s just being folded into the bailiwick of the World Health Organization.
From The Counter Signal, “A World Health Organization White Paper advocating for expanding WHO powers through the pandemic treaty puts tackling “infodemic” COVID “misinformation” at the top of their list.
Under the guise of “Community protection,” the WHO writes, “Infodemic of COVID-19 misinformation – often combined with ineffective and inconsistent risk communication and public health messaging – eroded public trust in public health authorities and science and undermined the effectiveness of public health and social measures and the demand for countermeasures such as vaccines.”
“… New techniques for infodemic management can counteract some of the corrosive effects of misinformation on public trust in science and authorities, but enduring trust and resilience must be built through effective engagement with communities before, during, and after health emergencies.”
According to the WHO, national governments should receive support to “coordinate risk communication and infodemic management policies and strategies that ensure health and wellbeing at all times” to build “misinformation” resilience.
The WHO further states that public health institutes should work with “influential private companies” to communicate the risk of misinformation and that social media should “develop infodemic management and community engagement tools.”
In other words, the WHO expects social media companies to continue doing what they’ve done throughout the pandemic: censor people and media organizations who go against the mainstream narrative.
But what’s an infodemic?
According to the WHO’s website, “An infodemic is too much information including false or misleading information in digital and physical environments during a disease outbreak. It causes confusion and risk-taking behaviours that can harm health.”
The WHO has further condemned infodemics for supposedly fomenting “conflict, violence, human rights violations and mass atrocities.” These are pretty serious assertions. Clearly, something must be done.
To this end, 132 Member States have signed a cross-regional statement to increase “societal resistance to disinformation” caused by infodemics.
As per the statement, “… We call on everybody to immediately cease spreading misinformation and to observe UN recommendations to tackle this issue, including the United Nations Guidance Note on Addressing and Countering COVID-19 related Hate Speech (11 May 2020).”
In researching this article, I came upon a document from 2021 entitled The Toxic Ten: How ten fringe publishers fuel 69% of digital climate change denial. This paper was put out by the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a British non-profit organisation with offices in London and Washington, DC. It campaigns for big tech firms to stop providing services to individuals who may promote hate and misinformation, including neo-Nazis and anti-vaccine advocates.
I will link to an interview on a podcast called Open Hands. From a Christian perspective, Pastor Larry Kirkpatrick talks with attorney and author, David Read, about the latest assault on our liberties by the World Health Organization, a specialized agency of the United Nations.
“The World Health Assembly will meet in Geneva, Switzerland, from May 22nd through the 28th to consider the United States’ proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations. If adopted, these changes would make the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) the sole arbiter of what is a “public health emergency of international concern,” and dictate how our government and others must respond to it.”
The International Health Regulations (IHR), first adopted by the World Health Assembly in 1969 and last revised in 2005, are a legally binding instrument of international law that aims for international collaboration "to prevent, protect against, control, and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks and that avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade". The IHR is the only international legal treaty with the responsibility of empowering the World Health Organization (WHO) to act as the main global surveillance system.
You better believe that the WHO and IHR have a full complement of lying scientists. We are the business. It’s depopulation. It’s surveillance capitalism. These white-coated priests of the new religion of Scientism, these “experts”, make a good living. They aren’t worried about the rising cost of fuel or groceries. They don’t worry about the increase in property taxes for their luxury penthouse or their beach house.
In 2008, Hoover Institution Press published Lenin’s Brain and Other Tales from the Secret Soviet Archives. Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov better known to us as Lenin, had an interesting past. Going back to his great grandparents, Russian, German, Swedish, Jewish, Chuvash and Kalmyk influences can be discovered. Russian speaking revolutionaries trained in New York. Jacob Schiff was one of the principal backers of the Bolshevik revolution and personally financed Trotsky’s trip from New York to Russia. Antony C. Sutton was a Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution and his Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution is worth reading.
As a young man, Lenin embraced revolutionary socialist politics and was a devout Marxist. As he was spreading egalitarianism it would appear that some young thing he was doing the egalitarian with was spreading syphilis.
By 1921, his health was in serious decline. Some doctors said that his symptoms were similar to those you would find with syphilis. Ivan Pavlov said the "revolution was made by a madman with syphilis of the brain". The state’s diagnosis was arteriosclerosis. He had at least three strokes prior to his death. Lenin’s body was still on display under bulletproof glass, in 2017. Though it looks more like a wax figure these days than a human being, the body is carefully tended to. The corpse is preserved by baths in various reagents and solutions like hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, ethyl alc., and quinine.
But Lenin’s brain was also thought to be worthy of study and preservation, so great was his genius. The Institute of Lenin served as a repository for Lenin’s writings and for other Lenin memorabilia. Among its most unusual items was Lenin’s brain, preserved in a formaldehyde solution in a glass jar. Lenin’s Brain and Other Tales from the Secret Soviet Archives is the story of the study of Lenin’s brain from early 1925 to 1936 as told by the sixty-three-page secret collection of documents from the Central Committee’s special files. “The display of Lenin’s embalmed body and the publication of this writings was a PR move to raise the fallen hero to the Immortals — but a team of physicians insisted that his brain receive scientific study. Russians needed scientific proof that Lenin was a genius. This was decided while the body was still warm.”
Scientists will lie about anything. Whole panels of them will award the Nobel Prize to a dog-torturing monster. They will starve millions in service of a theory and kill the few who are brave enough to oppose their lunacy. They will use gain-of-function technology to weaponize viruses. Dig up the corpses of WWI soldiers in order to get a bit of the Spanish Flu just to see if they could reconstruct it and make it more virulent.
In 2005 about that insane experiment, Anthony Fauci said “For the first time, researchers have deciphered the entire gene sequence of the 1918 virus and have used sophisticated techniques to assemble viruses that bear some or all of these genes so their effects can be understood. Importantly, they have identified gene sequences that may predict when an influenza virus strain is likely to spread among humans. They also have determined in the test tube and in mice which genes are most likely to account for the lethal effects of the 1918 virus.”
Scientists will mask little children, pump billons of people full of dangerous, inadequately tested vaccines, profit from the manufacture and sale of those vaccines and stand silent while people suffer serious injuries or die. Worse than their silence are their lies. They will take little slices off the brain of a madman and call those slices “proof of genius.”
© Not Sure
Biden to Transfer U.S. Sovereignty to the World Health Organization
Lysenkoism Against Genetics: The Meeting of the Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences of August 1948, Its Background, Causes, and Aftermath
Climatic Research Unit email controversy
Telegraph's Booker on the "climategate" scandal
IPCC now in Bizarroland: Pachauri releases "smutty" romance novel
The Heaving, Voluptuous Breasts of the IPCC Chief
Scientists Stage Worldwide Climate Change Protests After IPCC Report
(This article is more than 1 month old) IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster
(2008) Prince Charles: Eighteen months to stop climate change disaster
(This article is more than 13 years old) 100 months to act on climate, warns Charles
Gore: Arctic Ice May Soon Vanish in Summer
Myth of Arctic meltdown: Stunning satellite images show summer ice cap is thicker and covers 1.7million square kilometres MORE than 2 years ago...despite Al Gore's prediction it would be ICE-FREE by now
World Health Organization
International Health Regulations (2005) pdf
International Health Regulations
Beyond COVID-19: Reimagining The Role Of International Health Regulations In The Global Health Law Landscape
How climate law can help to prevent the next pandemic
THE TOXIC TEN - Center for Countering Digital Hate
Hilarious irony - Michael Mann to give lecture on 'Professional Ethics for Climate Scientists'
U.N. Climate Organization Wants Immunities Against Charges of Conflict of Interest, Exceeding Mandate, Among Others
WHO wants to censor infodemic “misinformation” with pandemic treaty
Publishing: The peer-review scam
Science’s Big Scandal
What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing's ‘death penalty'
Paid Publishing In Science Has Killed Peer Review System, Says CSIR’s Ex-Chief Shekhar Mande
DRDO Scientists Caught Manipulating Images In Almost 80 Research Papers
How Flawed WHO Vaccination Policies Led To Polio Paralysis In India In 1970s
Top Health Expert Dr Joseph Mercola Forced To Delete His 15,000 Articles In 48 Hours Due To Big Pharma Censorship
WHO Whistleblower Dr Astrid Stuckelberger Expose Suspicious Activities Of Bill Gates And GAVI
How A Pornstar & Sci-Fi Writer Influenced WHO Policies On Hydroxychloroquine With Fake Data
Company studying hydroxychloroquine employs sci-fi writer, adult content model
Russian revolutionary Lenin died from the sex disease syphilis NOT a stroke, claims historian
The curious and complicated history of Lenin’s brain
Opposition to communism of Ivan Pavlov
Pavlov’s Dog: The Experiment That Revolutionized Psychology
Fauci Rips ‘Very Disturbed’ RFK Jr.’s Attacks on His Career: ‘It’s a Shame’ Because He’s a Kennedy
CONDITIONED REFLEXES: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX
The Psychology of Vaccine Denial
Vaccine skepticism reflects basic cognitive differences in mortality-related event frequency estimation
Lancetgate: why was this “monumental fraud” not a huge scandal?
Pathologist Sounds the Alarm on Vaccines, Antibodies, and The CDC
Center for Countering Digital Hate