Aug. 21, 2009 (#391)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Aug. 21, 2009:

Rockefellers' Propaganda Sellers:

"Generations of Rockefellers Push On in Power,
Their Ardency for Eugenics has Never Turned Sour,
Promoting His Boy Holdren to Give Advice,
This Same Holdren Who Said We'd be Under Ice,
In Book 'Ecoscience' Called for Mass Sterilization,
Claimed Continuity with Smaller Civilization,
Parroting Patron Rockefeller Down Through Years,
Drumming Up Hysteria, Overpopulation Fears,
It's True Those with Money Make All the Rules,
But Those Who Think for Themselves are Not Willing Fools"
© Alan Watt Aug. 21, 2009


Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Aug. 21, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
alternate sites:  ,   .us  ,   .ca

mirror site:
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:

Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check – in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the August 21st, 2009.  Newcomers should look in to web site and scroll down on that front page and you’ll see all the other sites I have up there.  [listed above]  Bookmark them for future use in case any of the main sites go down again.  Hopefully, that way you’ll be able to pick up one of these sites and get the audios if that happens in the near future or whenever.  It happens once and a while.  Remember too, there’s a whole bunch to choose from.  It’s also a good idea if you notice any kind of sticking when you’re downloading on the .com site, it’s because too many people are going in to the one site at the same time.  If you try from one of the other sites, it’s often faster.  The last site I have there you’ll see is  That’s the European site and on that site you’ll find the same audios but you’ll also find transcripts for download of these talks for print up and they’re written in the various languages of Europe.  It’s very handy to have.  There’s more translators coming in all the time.  If you want to try your hand at it, get in touch with me at [listed above] and we’ll see what we can do. 


Remember, this is the only show out there where the listeners bring this program to you.  I don’t get paid by the advertisers or anyone else.  I don’t front for any NGO or corporation or any political faction whatsoever.  The ads on the show are paid straight to RBN, the station, for their time, for their equipment, their technicians and so on.  So it’s up to you to keep me going.  I depend on you buying the books and so on that I have for sale at and you can also donate.  PayPal buttons are there on the sites for donation or within the Americas, personal check is fine and within Canada, the same thing.  Outside the Americas you can use Western Union or MoneyGram.  Some people will use cash.  Amazing, eh, to think of posting cash and they cut out the banker.  Amazing.  Amazing that not more people do it.  From within the US, some people prefer to send international postal money orders.  You must make sure it’s INTERNATIONAL.  That’s the sort of orangey, pinkish one that they have.  The green one is for internal, US only and can not be cashed in Canada.  For those who get the disks burned and passed to them to play in their CD players - who stay away from computers because they’re wise - you can always get in touch with me [listed above].


I think everyone out there in the audience is pretty wisened up to the goings-on of government and agendas and global agendas by now.  They’re wisened up too.  A lot of them have gone through the death and rebirth phases you get when you realize that you’ve been living a lie.  When you realize that there’s no such thing as democracy and you have that sort of death, with all of its appropriate actions, anger, depressions and so on, until you come out of it with resolve.  Same thing happens when you realize that everything that you’ve been brain-washed with is a lie.  That’s what we talk about on this show.  The REAL world.  How it REALLY is outside conditioned responses that we all have.  Back with more after this break.


This is Alan Watt.  We’re Cutting Through The Matrix.  You know, people really underestimate the power of the foundations that started up an awful long time ago across the western world, especially the GIANTS in America.  It’s no coincidence that the giants were started off by bankers, big bankers, and international corporations, at least the owners of the big corporations like the Rockefellers, the Carnegies, the Morgans, the Fords and so on.  They had no intention of allowing a form of democracy to not only exist but even continue with that which they already have, in this form of a republic in the United States.  Same in Britain.  They were allied to the Anglo-American Establishment.  They were part of it.  Just the same as the groups in London, England.  The Milner Group, the Cecil Rhodes Foundation that became the Royal Institute for International Affairs with the Round Table Society, incorporated, had no intention of allowing democracy to really run the rest of the world or history from then on, for Britain.  Their plan was, of course, to use these big foundations, CIRCUMVENT democracy by creating political groups, action groups and funding them under the guise of non-governmental organizations.  These non-governmental organizations would have ALL the financial power they need and contacts given to them for lobbying direct to the government.  That was called the parallel government technique.  PARALLEL GOVERNMENT. 


This is what Professor Carroll Quigley talked about in his book, Tragedy and Hope, and he goes into it in more detail in his other book, The Anglo-American Establishment.  If you have to get a couple of books, get those 2 because there’s so much data in it.  It fills the blanks in history.  It fills in all the blanks.  Not just dates and times and battles, it tells you who financed them, why they financed them, why they caused these wars, and what they hope to gain from wars.  What they hoped to gain was literally a world empire.  Just taking down country after country at a time.  The standardization of the world by any and all means possible including using communism or sovietism to standardize a big chuck of Europe into the Russian bloc.  That was all done successfully BY these groups and bankers.  All of the top bankers too, were involved far more openly than they are today, although, they’re still out there.  Rockefeller’s up on YouTube still prancing around the world saying there’s too many people and they’ve got to find ways to sterilize them, etc, etc. 


Each foundation has its main topics that they have to keep bringing up into the public arena.  They call it - through advocation groups, etc - ‘raising public awareness,’ is what they term it.  It means they want to brain-wash you along a certain way of thinkingWhenever your hear that term you know you’re going to get brain-washed.  They’re into eugenics big time and the need to sterilize populations.  Remember, Rockefeller’s families also ran the American Eugenics Society.  They funded it from the beginning.  They even put a magazine out with the best family types, you know, the proper family types that should be allowed to breed, as opposed to the bad types who should not be allowed to breed.  They got policies put through IN the United States LONG BEFORE HITLER.  They were already sterilizing different kinds of people within the US itself.  It went on right up until the 1970s, by the way.  Now they don’t do that.  They simply tell you, your child in the womb might have a problem, it’s best to have it aborted.  That’s how they do it today. 


You have to look in to the people who are IN politics, just like their cousins in the Royal Institute for International Affairs.   They’re often IN politics or they’ve been in politics, then they’re back in at the tops of companies, the CEOs etc, and guiding their foundations and all the NGOs.  Well, Rockefeller here, as I say, is such an incredible player when you see all the information that’s been put out BY the Rockefeller family ON their agenda.  You could spend the rest of your life just following it.  Astonishing.  The power, POWER.  See, money is power.  That’s the sad thing about money.  Whoever’s got the most has got the power.  Simple as that.  Simple.  They buy off everybody… buy off everybody


Here’s an article that will tie in with the NEXT article about Rockefeller.  This article is from CQ Politics.



Science Nominees Blocked by Multiple Holds (Alan:  in the US.)

By Adrianne Kroepsch, CQ Staff   /  March 3, 2009


Multiple senators anonymously blocked the nominations of two top science advisers intended to play a major role in the Obama administration’s climate change policy, delaying their confirmation.


John P. Holdren, nominated to lead the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Jane Lubchenco, picked for undersecretary of Commerce for oceans and atmosphere, had been expected to receive a quick floor vote. They received an amicable confirmation hearing Feb. 12 and plaudits from the science community otherwise.


But Holdren, a Harvard University physicist, and Lubchenco, an Oregon State University marine biologist, may have to undergo an extra round of review, Senate style.


Multiple senators have placed anonymous holds on the science advisers’ nominations, according to John D. Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va., chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, which has jurisdiction over the nominations.  (A:  You see how they’re all placed where they want to be.  So here’s the rest of them voting it down here because they KNOW about what these characters, Holdren and Lubchenco, are all about.  They’re messiahs, really.  Messiahs to hype up the global warming thing that’s just a front for the eugenics policy that’s Mr. Rockefellers favorite - his whole family’s favorite - topic.  So here’s John D. Rockefeller, who’s chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, which has jurisdiction over the nominations.  Here’s what Rockefeller says.)


“It’s infuriating,” said Rockefeller, who backs Holdren and Lubchenco’s hiring. “They’re brilliant scientists.”  (A:  Well he should know because he’s backed them for about 30-40 years.  He’s backed these characters and probably had them groomed through the financing and so on in to the right agenda.  Remember, Holdren co-wrote a book back with Paul Ehrlich, another messiah of this whole agenda - sterilizing the public and so on - back in the 1970s, Ecoscience.  So here’s Rockefeller’s chosen pair, you see, his chosen people here and the rest weren’t going along with it at that time.  Well, we know since then that they got them in.  He’s got his way, as he always does.  Money talks doesn’t it?  Here’s another article here that follows into this, now that, of course, they’ve got the messiahs in there.  It says here…)


Rockefeller Refers to Obama’s Science Czar as ‘Walking on Water’

Wednesday, August 19, 2009  /  By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief


( - In a recent congressional hearing, Senate Commerce Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV (D.-W.V.) told John P. Holdren, President Barack Obama’s science czar, that he sometimes refers to Holdren as “walking on water.”  (A:  They love their little jokes don’t they?  They love them.  This guy, he is the new Jesus of global warming.  That’s what they all know, an in-house joke in the Senate and in the Congress.  That’s why he was put there.  They’re all put there for a reason at the right time, you see.  Remember, Holdren literally said in that book that he co-wrote with Paul Ehrlich, they could sterilize the folk in India and Africa, who are a bit ignorant basically, he inferred and they wouldn’t know any better.  It would be harder to do it in the West.  They’d have to find other ways.  Maybe putting something in their water, their food, etc, maybe even inoculations that would sterilize them.  This is the guy who’s now IN CHARGE of the science team advising Obama.  So we know.  The writing’s on the wall, isn’t it?)


Holdren is director the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and a top adviser to the president on climate-change policy.  (A:  Climate change policy, amazing, eh?)


In writings published in past years, Holdren has advocated “de-development” of the United States and redistribution of wealth both within and between nations.  (A:  You see, that was a plank of the Communist Manifesto if anyone’s wondering what’s going on.)


In a 1973 book, Holdren said: “The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being.”  (A:  They don’t look at them as being human beings you see.)


At a July 30 hearing of the Senate Commerce Committee focusing on climate change, Sen. Rockefeller complimented Holdren, using terms that alluded to one of the miracles recounted in the Gospels.


“The president, I think, has surrounded himself with some of the most brilliant choices,”  (A:  They’re brilliant because Rockefeller chose them, you see, FOR Obama.) said Rockefeller at the hearing. “Dr. Holdren, I don’t want to embarrass you, but I sometimes refer to you as walking on water.”  (A:  Isn’t that sweet?  Isn’t that sweet.)


I’ll put these links up on my web site at the end of the show and you can read all the rest of these particular articles.  I can’t be bothered going in to it because the rest is just propaganda.  Most of it always is, isn’t it?  It’s propaganda for the cattle down below. 


Scam after scam happens.  Remember I read a whole articles from a site before where they tell you… there’s different quotes from the Holdren’s and all the different characters and Greenpeace and how they terrify the public by giving them scary scenarios, etc to get them to accept the policies that THEY want to have us all live under.  The NEW way of living.  This is from a web site called  He really follows all this global warming scam and so on.  I’ll be back with more on this topic after these messages. 


I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix.  I sometimes let that guitar wail a bit because you get into the wailing mood once in a while when you see the nonsense that going on.  You really wish that people would all wake up at once and be conscious, but of course, that will never happen.  But it’s still a dream, isn’t it?  ‘I have a dream.’  ‘I have a dream’, very popular statement there.  Anyway, getting back to this article by Anthony Watts, 


Ice Capades: Greenpeace recants polar ice claim, but “emotionalizing” is OK

19/08/2009 /


Well it is that time of year again, the Arctic ice begins to melt, as it does every year, and all sorts of crazy talk starts coming out. This time from Greenpeace. I am encouraged though, as they have come around to the idea that maybe they are doing more harm than good by overselling the alarmism.


NSIDC also has taken a more moderate tone, announcing that there will “likely be no record low ice extent in 2009“. This is a sharp contrast to last year’s ridiculous press statement from NSIDC’s Dr. Mark Serreze about an “ice free north pole”. Now that Greenpeace has come clean on their statement, maybe Dr. Serreze will finally admit his statement was “a mistake”. – Anthony


From Not Evil Just Wrong:


The outgoing leader of Greenpeace has admitted his organization’s recent claim that the Arctic Ice will disappear by 2030 was “a mistake.”


Greenpeace made the claim in a July 15 press release entitled “Urgent Action Needed As Arctic Ice Melts,” which said there will be an ice-free Arctic by 2030 because of global warming.


Under close questioning by BBC reporter Stephen Sackur on the “Hardtalk” program, Gerd Leipold, the retiring leader of Greenpeace, said the claim was wrong.


“I don’t think it will be melting by 2030. … That may have been a mistake,” he said.


Sackur said the claim was inaccurate on two fronts, pointing out that the Arctic ice is a mass of 1.6 million square kilometers with a thickness of 3 km in the middle, and that it had survived much warmer periods in history than the present.


The BBC reporter accused Leipold and Greenpeace of releasing “misleading information” and using “exaggeration and alarmism.”


Leipold’s admission that Greenpeace issued misleading information (A:  He’s admitted it.)  is a major embarrassment to the organization, which often has been accused of alarmism but has always insisted that it applies full scientific rigor in its global-warming pronouncements.


Although he admitted Greenpeace had released inaccurate but alarming information, Leipold defended the organization’s practice of “emotionalizing issues” (A:  That’s what I’ve told you before.  Emotive topics.  They get you into an EMOTIONAL state; they don’t give you the facts or the truth.) in order to bring the public around to its way of thinking (A:  So there’s you’re whole point there.  It’s propaganda.  They’re ‘raising public consciousness’ to get you around to what they WANT you to think about and BELIEVE.  Once you believe what they want you to believe, then it’s been successful.  That’s what they mean by that.)  and alter public opinion(A:  So they use EMOTIONS to do all this stuff.  That’s why they always show you a polar bear swimming in the sea and getting onto an ice flow, but they don’t tell you that the bears can actually swim hundreds of miles in that water.)


Leipold said later in the BBC interview that there is an urgent need for the suppression of economic growth in the United States (A:  Now, doesn’t that tie right in with what I just talked about there with Mr. Rockefeller’s appointee, John Holdren, who also wants to do the same thing?  … in the United States, the suppression of economic growth.  You starting to get the picture of how they ALL WORK TOGETHER because they’re all separate parts of the same darned thing?)  and around the world(A:  Around the world too.  This is to become the GLOBAL PLANTATION.)  He said annual growth rates of 3 percent to 8 percent cannot continue without serious consequences for the climate.  (A:  Good lord, good lord.)


“We will definitely have to move to a different concept of growth. … The lifestyle of the rich in the world is not a sustainable model,” (A:  Except for our bosses.  [laughs]) Leipold said. “If you take the lifestyle, its cost on the environment, and you multiply it with the billions of people and an increasing world population, you come up with numbers which are truly scary.” 


I really PUT a challenge out there for all these top people, all these top people, to be an example to us all and go forth and have it publicly shown on video - they can put it up on Google - of THEM having vasectomies and being sterilized And maybe euthanizing each other… as excess population.  That’s what I want to see.  …And living in a third world type of scenario… like forever, voluntarily.  Or… does it really mean that we’re all supposed to come down to all be sterilized, live in a third world nation - international nation, basically, in third-world type scenarios - while the elite, the truly better types like themselves, continue living very rich and high on the hog? 


Anyway, it says “Watch the full BBC interview with Leopold here.”  There’s a link on this site.  It will take you to the whole BBC interview for you to watch for yourself to see how these elitist types, the ones who are better designed to survive in the world while we should all just sort of melt away.  That’s what it is.  These are eugenicists.  These are Nazis.  These are the Soviet elitists, too, that want to create the ‘Soviet Man’.  It’s the same organization.  Look at the Rockefellers.  Look at what they funded, the massive companies, like IG Farben, the war machines for these organizations.  They’ve never changed their tunes.  Back with more after this break.


Hi.  I am Alan Watt.  We’re Cutting Through The Matrix.  We’ve all seen numerous articles on the pushing and promoting, by politicians across Europe and America and Canada, to do with the modified, GM, food… crops especially.  The US is going ahead gung-ho with all of this.  So is Canada.  If fact, I keep telling people Canada was the guinea pig.  We didn’t know for 10 years that we were the guinea pigs to test this stuff out.  The government admitted, after it was exposed from Britain, that they made a secret deal with Monsanto and other companies to test this stuff out on the populations in Canada.  But not before, mind you, not before… I think it was Miss Stewart at the time, in politics, arranged for a central computer to be set up in Canada in Ottawa, parliament, where the bureaucrats could get ALL the data of ALL the Canadians across the country, all kinds of data including doctor’s visits and diagnosis and so on.  They never told the public it was to do with GM food.  We didn’t know anything about GM food at that time, but that was part of it.  They keep track, instantaneously now, of the effects it has on people… but they don’t tell the public.  That’s democracy in action.  If there’s really been a time of fascism, we’re living in it now.  This new system is to be a sort of communistic/collectivist system for the public, the masses, the great masses, and it’s to have a fascistic, small elite over the top - the very rich men of the world.  That’s exactly what we have.  That’s how it’s run. 


This article here is from the Associated Press.  It’s also in KSFM news. 


Farmers suing German-based Bayer Cropscience
over genetically engineered strain of rice

By Associated Press  /  August 20, 2009


LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Nearly 1,500 rice farmers are suing the German conglomerate Bayer Crop science (A:  Bayer, remember, is a Rothschild company.  That’s their real family name.)  and affiliated companies over a genetically engineered strain of rice.


The lawsuit filed Tuesday in federal court in Little Rock claims the farmers' crops were corrupted by the rice that was produced by Bayer.


The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced in August 2006 that traces of an unapproved genetically engineered rice had been found in U.S. supplies of long-grain rice. The lawsuit says Bayer and Riceland Foods Inc. confirmed the traces in early 2006 but didn't tell farmers (A:  Well, that’s again, the way it works in reality.), the government or the public until July or August.


A dollar amount being sought in damages is not given in the complaint.


A spokesman for Bayer said he had not seen the lawsuit and couldn't comment.  (A:  Of course.)


As I say, this has many different… There’s a lot of these articles appearing.  I just read that a lot of US shipments abroad have been stopped at other countries because the grain that they were selling across to Europe were stopped because they were containing GM traces and so on.  What this will do is cause major confusion and more hype in the media and politics because the INTENT is to raise it to a crisis pitch so that we’ll say, ‘we just can’t go on like this.  It’s impossible to keep the stuff out of the regular grains.  If we hold this lot back, well, people will starve.  Let’s pass laws so that they accept GM anyway.’  That’s the way they’re working it.  That’s the way they’re working it.  That’s why you’re having all of these articles out at the same time.  They’ll get their way.  They always get their way at the top.  They have no real opposition at the top at all, on anything.  They really, really don’t.  This is nothing against this agenda.  Especially when you have a well-trained, completely indoctrinated general public in every country in the world who believes nothing but what the television tells them.  Exactly as Brzezinski said they would, has happened… unfortunately.  It really has happened. 


I’ve talked before about all the different paths.  There’s so many different AREAS of this new world order.  How if you go into the communist writings - the early ones - and you go in to the writings of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Albert Pike… Remember Pike also authorized the World Revolutionary Party, which became the Communist Party, through Mazzini, and the guy that took over eventually, after the next one, was - as we all know - it was Lenin.  Pike also chartered other branches but they’re all REVOLUTIONARY branches.  In fact, many of the older newspapers that I have here - they have their own magazines here - this one’s called The New Age.  That was the title in the 40s and 50s of their major magazine.  They admitted they were behind pretty well ALL revolutions across the world.  


We think revolutions are just bloody things.  MOST REVOLUTIONS ARE SLOW, INCREMENTAL - Fabian style - and bloodlessIt’s always to change your entire culture and way of living.  …as, of course, is this global warming scam too.  That’s going to make us all live differently, eat differently, and allow governments to mandate everything from cradle to grave.  They’ll be no personal choices in this world they’re bringing up. 


The family unit had to be destroyed.  They ALL harped on about that, how they had to destroy the family unit.  Russell, Bertrand Russell, LORD Bertrand Russell, who was a multi-generational PEER of the realm, of Britain, a chinless wonder.  Micrognathia is common with them.   They have no chins with interbreeding.  He wrote so much for the big foundation boys in order to get their agenda through.  He talked about the need for the state… exactly as the Soviets thought about initially.  Their idea was that the state would remove children at birth from their parents.  You’d never know where that child went.  The state would rear them collectively.  They would have a state indoctrination so that they could never pick up ‘contaminated ideas’ from their families and they’d never know who their families were.  But then he found through experimental schooling and he was given a royal charter to allow him to do things that everybody else would have been hung for in Britain at that time.  He had experimental schools and he tried to encourage the children into PRE-pubertal sex to see if they would stop bonding for longer periods of time with other people of the other sex.  That’s where all that experimentation came from.  It was mainly from the Bertrand Russell schools. 


The only country that put that into direct policy and tried it out was Israel in the early days with the Kibbutzes.  They did take the children away.  The children were raised communally, together in a Koresh sort of idea.  That didn’t work out for too long because the mothers wanted to raise the children themselves.  There’s a great book.  It’s called, Children of the Dream, written by and Israeli at the time who was all for that whole idea.  The group who moved in to create Israel and took over, were mainly from Russia.  They were more communistic, that’s why they left Russia.  They said that Soviet Russia was not Marxist enough; it had not gone the whole way.  Russell, eventually, he said, due to his experiments in the schools, he found that if they can get the children as young as 2 for kindergarten, they could SO indoctrinate them with SCIENTIFIC INDOCTRINATION that whatever their parents tried to teach them at home about morals, old-fashioned ideas, religion and so on, would be NULL AND VOID.  It would not TAKE with the child; the teaching would override it.  Therefore, he said, it’s much better this way.  It’s more economical for the parents to be liable for the cost of raising the child than the state.  That would save the state the burden of it and they could use their money for other great projects, etc. 


It’s fascinating to see all of this happening in our lifetime.  The collectivistic idea, commutarianism being promoted by Presidents of the United States, openly, calling it that too.  Al Gore going in to schools and talking to 11 and 12 year olds saying you know more than your parents.  In other words, your parents are rather stupid, don’t listen to them, etc, etc.  And many of these other characters doing the same kind of stuff.  I’ve mentioned the link before, where you can actually see him doing it in a school.  It’s up on Google.  So what chance do we have really?  What chance do we have today where they’re going after home schoolers?  Hillary, remember Hillary a few years ago said the same thing.  If she got in, her main target would be to end home schooling.  No exemptions.  No exemptions at all.  Just like they’re taking away all exemptions right now for inoculations.  Philosophical, religious, whatever… they’re scrapping them.  And people DO NOTHING.  NOTHING.  When you want to stop something, you do it BEFORE IT’S MADE LAW.  You don’t sit and wait and wait and wait till your back is against the wall. 


This article here is from the Telegraph.  What’s happening in the UK and New Zealand and all over the world is happening in the US and Canada at the same time as well.  Everything, you notice, is standardized.  Same organizations.  Same social workers.  Same everything.  Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.  We’re a global society RUN by the United Nations


'Evil destruction' of a happy family

A system involving social workers, police and courts took a child away from loving parents for no apparent reason, writes Christopher Booker.

 By Christopher Booker  /  18 Jul 2009


Two weeks ago I reported as shocking a story as this column has ever covered. It described how a loving family was torn apart when the parents were arrested by police on what turned out to be wholly spurious charges, so (A:  In order…) that their three children could be taken into care by social workers.  (A:  Now you have social workers and the police scheming to dream up spurious charges so that when the parents are arrested, they can whisk away the children into social care.)


However a new case has lately been surfacing, if anything even more shocking. This also involved the arrest of two parents and the abduction of their child by social workers, in a story so bizarre that, at last week’s Prime Minister’s Questions (A:  in Parliament)  Gordon Brown was asked about it by the family’s MP, Charles Hendry, who has long been concerned with the case because the mother is a branch vice-chairman in his local Conservative Association. The family’s horrified GP (A:  Doctor.) says that, in 43 years of medical practice, he has never “encountered a case of such appalling injustice”.


I first planned to describe this case in April, but was pre-empted by the draconian reporting restrictions on family cases, which, for reasons that will become tragically clear, have now been partly lifted.


The story began in April 2007 when “Mr Smith”, as I must call him, had a visit from the RSPCA over the dog-breeding business he ran from the family home. He had docked the tails of five newborn puppies – a procedure that had become illegal two days beforehand. Unaware of this, he promised in future to obey the new law.


Three days later, however, at nine o’clock in the morning, two RSPCA officials returned, accompanied in cars and riot vans by 18 policemen, who had apparently been tipped off, quite wrongly, that Mr Smith had guns in the house.  (A:  See.  This is rigged up by the social workers.)


Armed with pepper spray, they ransacked the house, looking for the nonexistent guns. The dogs, released from their kennels, also rampaged through the house. When Mr Smith and his wife, who was three months pregnant, volubly protested at what was happening, they were forcibly arrested in front of their screaming five-year-old daughter “Jenny” and taken away. Two hours later, with the house in a shambles – the dogs having strewn the rabbit entrails meant for their dinner across the floor – social workers arrived to remove the crying child.


Held for hours in a police cell, Mrs Smith had a miscarriage. When she was finally set free, she returned home that evening to find her daughter gone. It was the beginning of a barely comprehensible nightmare.


Her husband was charged with various offences connected with the dogs, including the taildocking, but was eventually given a conditional discharge by a judge who accepted that he was “an animal lover” who had not been cruel to his dogs.


Far more serious, however, was that the social workers seemed determined to hang on to the child, now in foster care, on the sole grounds that they had found the house dirty and in a mess (the “animal entrails” played a large part in their evidence). (A:  So, they went in after a police raid and everything was all over the place.)  This was despite the testimony of a woman Pc (A:  Police constable.) (who had visited the house a month earlier on a different matter) that she found it “clean and tidy”. Two hundred horrified local residents, who knew the couple as doting parents of a happy, well-cared-for child, were about to stage a protest demonstration when they were stopped by the police, on the social workers’ instructions that this might identify the child.  (A:  Do you  know the social worker agencies are SERVICES?  All these characters start off, so did the police, as services.)


For more than two years the couple have been fighting through 74 hearings in the courts to win their daughter back. From a mass of evidence, including psychiatric reports and tape recordings made at meetings with her parents (only allowed in the presence of social workers), it is clear she has been desperate to return home. The family believe that considerable pressure has been brought on the child to turn her against her parents.  (A:  That’s what they always try and do.)


One particularly bizarre psychiatric report was compiled after only an hour-long interview with the little girl. When she said she had once choked on a lollipop, this was interpreted as signifying that she could possibly have “been forced to have oral sex with her father”.   (A:   You see these guys, these psychiatrists, are real sickos.  They really, really are sickos.)


After the parents had been subjected to four different psychiatric investigations, which came up with mixed findings, they refused to submit to a fifth, and this apparently weighed heavily with the judge who last December ordered that “Jenny” should be put out to adoption.


In the Appeal Court 11 days ago, Mr Justice Bodey ruled that, because the father had refused that fifth test, indicating that the parents put their own “emotional wellbeing” in front of that of their child, the adoption order must stand. When this judgment was reported, an independent social worker, who had earlier been an expert witness in the case, wrote to Mr and Mrs Smith to say he was “horrified” to learn that Jenny was “not back in their care”, having assumed for over a year that “she must have been returned home”.


Their equally horrified GP, saying that he had never “encountered such a case of appalling injustice”, wrote “the destruction of this once happy family is in my opinion evil”. So shocked was their MP, Mr Hendry, that he last Wednesday took the highly unusual course of raising the case at Prime Minister’s Questions. Numerous others who know the family well have expressed similar dismay. One neighbour, herself a former social worker, whose own daughter often played with “Jenny”, said: “I worked with children in social services for 25 years and I have never seen anything like this. It is disgusting.”  


You know something?  I think it’s time that the civilians got themselves into training - and I really mean this - and start off little commando outfits to start raiding these people, these organizations, to get children back and stuff like that.  It looks to me that there’s a real big agenda underway.  I don’t have to guess at this.  There is a massive agenda underway.  You see, all organizations end up wanting more and more and more power.  If there’s anything in history you learn, that’s what you learn.  They will never stop.  They go into craziness eventually and they still never stop until the people stop it.  It’s time that all of these organizations were done away with.  Completely.  Utterly done away with. 


The premise is that they can’t allow any child to be hurt.  Well, I’ll tell you something.  You can not put restrictive, totalitarian laws across everyone and all of their children, worldwide, because of a FEW that will definitely, and they definitely will be abused.  That’s now how law and justice works.  You don’t punish the lot for the sake of the few.  THAT’S COLLECTIVIST BEHAVIOR.  That’s what they did in the Soviet Union.  I DON’T WANT THAT IN THIS WORLD.  Back in a moment after these messages. 


I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ll go to the callers now.  There’s Robby from Missouri.  Are you there Robbie?


Robbie:  Yes, sir.


Alan:  Yes. Go ahead.


Robbie:  Alan.  I’m calling to remind your listeners that next Wednesday is the Alan Watt international economic stimulus day that was established a couple nights ago I believe.  Joe mentioned, he said, I’m looking at 8/26.  I don’t know how he picked that but that is it.  Let’s say all listeners, a little something in August.  That’s a reminder.  I’d like to tell a little story.  I don’t remember how I found you on the internet but I’ve listened to you for quite some time and started downloading things.  After so long a period of time, I realized that you can’t really do the journey without the books and the CDs. 


Now, I just got your Waiting For the Miracle book, the last one that you wrote.  You wrote me a little note in there and Alan, that’s the greatest… That is a good book.  I like to listen and read a book at the same time.  That’s the way I’m built.  It’s the Sweet Liberty series; I think it’s mandatory to serious listeners.  I can say that when I first started listening to you in 99% of your site was free.  Now, it’s 99.99% free.  People should get them books and they should get them now while they’re available.  You were just saying, we’ve got to get moving.  I don’t see.  Maybe there’s self-adepts or something but you need the books.  There’s some CDs.  There’s Reality Check.  Everybody knows what I mean.  So, next Wednesday is economic stimulus and I’d say buy the books.  I’ve talked to you before.  I’ve read them many times.  When you said deprogramming, which is what you get… I’m a programmer and I said well this is reprogramming.  Now, I finally realize that you can not reprogram us.  You can deprogram us. 


Alan:  That’s right.


Robbie:  I’m on a journey now and every night when I listen to you now, sometimes it’s repetitious but it’s like virus alerts.  They code the writing.  Everything that you point out.  You need the books, listeners.  Get them while they’re hot.  You just said a few minutes earlier, time’s a wasting. 


Alan:  It truly is.  Truly is.


Robbie:  Time’s a wasting.  Thank you so much, Alan.


Alan:  Thanks, Robbie.  You take care. 


Robbie:  Yes, sir.


Alan:  It’s true enough.  You don’t believe how many tricks are played on the public.  They don’t know.  They really don’t know how psychology and science is played on them every single day from every single article they read to the pictures on the articles and so on.  They don’t think about things but they’re programmed through visual symbolism and all the rest of it.  If you understand that, it gives you a fighting chance.  It really does wake you up into a higher level. 


From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. 



Topics of show covered in following links:


"Science Nominees Blocked by Multiple Holds" by Adrianne Kroepsch, CQ Politics - March 3, 2009.
(Article at original link was removed. Link is to excerpt in transcript text.)

"Rockefeller Refers to Obama's Science Czar as 'Walking on Water' " by Terence P. Jeffrey ( - Aug. 19, 2009.

"Ice Capades: Greenpeace recants polar ice claim, but "emotionalizing" is OK" ( - Aug. 19, 2009.

"Farmers suing German-based Bayer Cropscience over genetically engineered strain of rice" by Associated Press (at - Aug. 20, 2009.

" 'Evil destruction' of a happy family - A system involving social workers, police and courts took a child away from loving parents for no apparent reason" by Christopher Booker ( - July 18, 2009.



Transcribed by Diana


Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:


"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3


"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)


Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)


Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)


"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"